Mathur, Chandana
(2015)
Anthropology and the Irish Encounter.
American Anthropologist, 117.
pp. 145-146.
ISSN 0002-7294
Abstract
In their discussion of ancestral versus contemporary anthropology
in Ireland, Keith Egan and Fiona Murphy (this issue)
do not draw a parallel distinction, quite probably deliberately,
between “metropolitan” and “native” anthropologies.
Positing a category of “native anthropology” opens up an
explosive set of issues about the claim to be “native”—all the
more combustible in a place that has known settler colonialism
since the 12th century, tidalwaves of out-migration (and
consequently a vast and tuned-in diaspora) due to famine in
the 19th and economic stagnation in the 20th century, and
a total demographic makeover through in-migration in the
past two decades. Nonetheless, even though they do not resort
to this distinction, Egan and Murphy are likely to agree
that they are describing an Irish version of a quandary that is
all too familiar to native anthropologists from marginal anthropological
traditions, predominantly in the postcolonial
world: namely, what is to be done when the acknowledged
gold standard of metropolitan ethnographic writing renders
your home place in a way that is unrecognizable to you?
Item Type: |
Article
|
Keywords: |
Anthropology; Irish Encounter; |
Academic Unit: |
Faculty of Social Sciences > Anthropology |
Item ID: |
8375 |
Depositing User: |
Dr. Chandana Mathur
|
Date Deposited: |
27 Jun 2017 14:57 |
Journal or Publication Title: |
American Anthropologist |
Publisher: |
American Anthropological Association |
Refereed: |
Yes |
URI: |
|
Use Licence: |
This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available
here |
Repository Staff Only(login required)
|
Item control page |
Downloads per month over past year
Origin of downloads