MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Are Schwartz & Carroll’s 5 Business & Society Frameworks Still Dominant?


    Cullen, John G. (2017) Are Schwartz & Carroll’s 5 Business & Society Frameworks Still Dominant? Working Paper. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

    [img]
    Preview
    Download (44kB) | Preview


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    In 2008, Business & Society published Schwartz and Carroll's description of five central frameworks that had come to dominate the field of Business & Society. Although frequently cited, there has been no empirical analysis or verification of these frameworks or inter-relationships between them. This research note aims to address this by providing bibliometric data on peer-reviewed research outputs conducted on these frameworks since this article first appeared. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ and ‘Stakeholder Management Theory’ are clearly the most researched frameworks, and ‘Sustainability’ has demonstrated significant growth over the ten years since the article was first published. ‘Business Ethics’ and (to a greater extent) ‘Corporate Citizenship’ appear to have grown less as research fields, but there may be some evidence of areas of ‘cross-over’ between fields. The limitations of this research are discussed alongside avenues and opportunities for developing deeper understanding of these business & society frameworks.

    Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
    Keywords: Corporate Society Responsibility; Sustainability; Stakeholder theory; Corporate Citizenship; Business Ethics: Bibliometrics; Business & Society Frameworks;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Business
    Item ID: 8810
    Depositing User: Dr. John G. Cullen
    Date Deposited: 15 Sep 2017 10:26
    URI:

      Repository Staff Only(login required)

      View Item Item control page

      Downloads

      Downloads per month over past year