MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    How much structure is best? A comparison of market model, factor model and unstructured equity covariance matrices


    Briner, Beat G. and Connor, Gregory (2008) How much structure is best? A comparison of market model, factor model and unstructured equity covariance matrices. Journal of Risk, 10 (4). pp. 3-30. ISSN 1465-1211

    [img] Download (298kB)


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    This paper compares three approaches to estimating equity covariance matrices: a factor model, a market model and an unstructured asset-by-asset model. These approaches make different trade-offs between estimation variance and model specification error. We explore this trade-off with a simulation experiment and with an empirical analysis of UK equity portfolios. The factor model is found to perform best for large investment universes and typical sample lengths. The market model underperforms due to excessive specification error while an asset-by-asset model with a short half-life of 22 days underperforms due to high estimation variance. The importance of properly accounting for serial correlation is highlighted.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: Postprint version of original published article. The definitive version is available at http://www.thejournalofrisk.com/
    Keywords: structure; comparison; market model; factor model; unstructured equity; covariance matrices; estimation; variance; asset-by-asset;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Finance and Accounting
    Item ID: 3521
    Depositing User: Gregory Connor
    Date Deposited: 06 Mar 2012 16:33
    Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Risk
    Publisher: Risk Journals
    Refereed: Yes
    URI:

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year