Briner, Beat G. and Connor, Gregory (2008) How much structure is best? A comparison of market model, factor model and unstructured equity covariance matrices. Journal of Risk, 10 (4). pp. 3-30. ISSN 1465-1211
PDF
BB_How_Much_Structure_is_Best_Jun_08.pdf
Download (298kB)
BB_How_Much_Structure_is_Best_Jun_08.pdf
Download (298kB)
Abstract
This paper compares three approaches to estimating equity covariance
matrices: a factor model, a market model and an unstructured asset-by-asset
model. These approaches make different trade-offs between estimation
variance and model specification error. We explore this trade-off with
a simulation experiment and with an empirical analysis of UK equity
portfolios. The factor model is found to perform best for large investment
universes and typical sample lengths. The market model underperforms due
to excessive specification error while an asset-by-asset model with a short
half-life of 22 days underperforms due to high estimation variance. The
importance of properly accounting for serial correlation is highlighted.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Postprint version of original published article. The definitive version is available at http://www.thejournalofrisk.com/ |
Keywords: | structure; comparison; market model; factor model; unstructured equity; covariance matrices; estimation; variance; asset-by-asset; |
Academic Unit: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Finance and Accounting |
Item ID: | 3521 |
Depositing User: | Gregory Connor |
Date Deposited: | 06 Mar 2012 16:33 |
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Risk |
Publisher: | Risk Journals |
Refereed: | Yes |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/3521 |
Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year