MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library

    Red, Riotous and Wrong: Is the Secondary Quality Analogy an Unpalatable Doctrine?

    McCauley, Harry (2007) Red, Riotous and Wrong: Is the Secondary Quality Analogy an Unpalatable Doctrine? Maynooth Philosophical Papers (4). pp. 23-30.

    [img] Download (174kB)

    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...

    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    In recent analytical moral theory a debate has been raging for some time now about the merits and demerits of realism about morality. Two main schools of moral realists have emerged on opposite sides of the Atlantic. In the US various naturalist realists 'prominent amongst them, the socalled Cornell realists' have canvassed various versions of the view that moral properties are real and are either reducible to, or are constituted out of natural properties. 1 In the UK moral realism has taken a somewhat different direction. More under the thrall of Moore and the 'open question argument' than the Americans, the British realists have tended to reject the naturalist path and have tried to find some way in which to defend a conception of moral properties in which such properties are seen as objective and mindindependent, without thereby being reduced, to or constituted out of natural properties.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: Red; Riotous; Analogy; Doctrine;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Arts & Humanities > Philosophy
    Item ID: 1007
    Depositing User: Harry McCauley
    Date Deposited: 20 May 2008
    Journal or Publication Title: Maynooth Philosophical Papers
    Publisher: Department of Philosophy NUIM
    Refereed: Yes
      Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

      Repository Staff Only(login required)

      View Item Item control page


      Downloads per month over past year

      Origin of downloads