MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Does paired mentoring work? A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science


    Sharpe, Rachael and Abrahams, Ian and Fotou, Nikolaos (2018) Does paired mentoring work? A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36 (2). pp. 205-225. ISSN 0263-5143

    [img]
    Preview
    Download (2MB) | Preview


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    Background In England, there is a growing need to improve the lives of secondary school students who are defined as disadvantaged and to support these students in their attainment and attitudes to secondary school science. Purpose This paper reports on a project designed to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds by pairing them with undergraduate mentors from a university throughout the final year of their compulsory science education in England (Year 11 – aged 15–16) at the end of which students take their public General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) examinations. Sample The study, set up as a randomised control trial, involved 86 disadvantaged students – students from low-income families who are eligible for free school meals, or had been looked after for more than six months, or whose parent(s) are currently in the Armed Forces. Four schools were recruited. The schools were similar in terms of the proportion of free school meals, GCSE 5A*-C measures and value-added performance to reduce the likelihood of any effect being attributable to factors other than mentoring. Design and methods Students were recruited from four schools and were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups – half in each group. Experimental group students were mentored for one hour per week for 23 weeks up until their GCSE examinations with an intensive six-hour mentoring session just prior to those examinations. Data were collected from the Year 11’s mock and actual GCSE examination results as well as questionnaires from Year 11 and undergraduate mentors. Results It was found that mentored students did statistically better in terms of attainment in both mock and actual GCSEs examinations and also showed a statistically significantly greater improvement in their attitudes to science than un-mentored students. Conclusions These findings indicate the value of academically asymmetrical paired mentoring for disadvantaged students within science.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: Paired mentoring; attitudes; summative assessment; secondary school;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Education
    Item ID: 11539
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1355783
    Depositing User: Dr Nikolaos Fotou
    Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2019 15:56
    Journal or Publication Title: Research in Science & Technological Education
    Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge
    Refereed: Yes
    URI:

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year