MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library

    What do aggregation results really reveal about group agency?

    Flanagan, Brian (2018) What do aggregation results really reveal about group agency? Philosophical Studies, 175. pp. 261-276. ISSN 0031-8116

    Download (377kB) | Preview

    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...

    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Discoveries about attitude aggregation have prompted the re-emergence of non-reductionism, the theory that group agency is irreducible to individual agency. This paper rejects the revival of non-reductionism and, in so doing, challenges the preference for a unified account, according to which, agency, in all its manifestations, is rational. First, I offer a clarifying reconstruction of the new argument against reductionism (due to Christian List and Philip Pettit). Second, I show that a hitherto silent premise, namely, that an identified group intention need not be determined by member attitudes according to a rule, e.g., majority, is false. Third, I show that, on rejecting this premise, the aggregation results lead instead to the conclusion that, in contrast to individual agency, group agency is non-rational.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: Group agency; Collective intentionality; Judgement aggregation; Social ontology; Reductionism; Discursive dilemma;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
    Item ID: 11650
    Identification Number:
    Depositing User: Brian Flanagan
    Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2019 16:25
    Journal or Publication Title: Philosophical Studies
    Publisher: Springer Verlag
    Refereed: Yes
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page


    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads