Düsterhus, André and Hense, Andreas
(2014)
Automated quality evaluation for a more effective data peer review.
Data Science Journal, 13.
pp. 67-78.
ISSN 1683-1470
Abstract
A peer review scheme comparable to that used in traditional scientific journals is a major element missing in bringing publications of raw data up to standards equivalent to those of traditional publications. This paper introduces a quality evaluation process designed to analyse the technical quality as well as the content of a dataset. This process is based on quality tests, the results of which are evaluated with the help of the knowledge of an expert. As a result, the quality is estimated by a single value only. Further, the paper includes an application and a critical discussion on the potential for success, the possible introduction of the process into data centres, and practical implications of the scheme.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Keywords: |
Data peer review; Data publication; Quality evaluation; Statistical quality assurance; Meteorological data; |
Academic Unit: |
Faculty of Social Sciences > Geography |
Item ID: |
12288 |
Identification Number: |
https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.14-009 |
Depositing User: |
André Düsterhus
|
Date Deposited: |
30 Jan 2020 12:32 |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Data Science Journal |
Publisher: |
Ubiquity Press |
Refereed: |
Yes |
URI: |
|
Use Licence: |
This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available
here |
Repository Staff Only(login required)
|
Item control page |
Downloads per month over past year
Origin of downloads