MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure


    Rushton, Paula W. and Smith, Emma M. and Miller, William C. and Kirby, R. Lee and Daoust, Geneviève (2019) Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14 (3). pp. 250-254. ISSN 1748-3107

    [img]
    Preview
    Download (833kB) | Preview


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting manual wheelchair skills (SEATS-M) and Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting power wheelchair skills (SEATS-P). Methods: A 2-week test–retest design was used with a convenience sample of occupational and physical therapists who worked at a provincial rehabilitation centre (inpatient and outpatient services). Sixteen participants completed the SEATS-M and 18 participants completed the SEATS-P. Results: For the SEATS-M assessment, training, spotting and documentation sections, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.90 to 0.97, the 2-week intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1,1) ranged from 0.81 to 0.95, the standard error of measurements (SEM) ranged from 5.06 to 8.70 and the smallest real differences (SRD) ranged from 6.24 to 8.18. For the SEATS-P assessment, training, spotting and documentation sections, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.92, the ICCs ranged from 0.72 to 0.86, the SEMs ranged from 4.54 to 8.91 and the SRDs ranged from 5.90 to 8.27. Conclusions: There is preliminary evidence that both the SEATS-M and the SEATS-P have high internal consistency, good test–retest reliability and support for responsiveness. These tools can be used in evaluating clinician self-efficacy with assessing, training, spotting and documenting wheelchair skills included on the Wheelchair Skills Test.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: Cite as: Paula W. Rushton, Emma M. Smith, William C. Miller, R. Lee Kirby & Geneviève Daoust (2019) Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14:3, 250-254, DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428370
    Keywords: confidence; wheelchair skills; measurement; reliability; responsiveness;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Science and Engineering > Psychology
    Item ID: 15404
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1428370
    Depositing User: Emma Smith
    Date Deposited: 02 Feb 2022 15:13
    Journal or Publication Title: Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
    Publisher: Taylor & Francis
    Refereed: Yes
    URI:
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads