Wendt, Fabian and Nielsen, Kim and Yu, Yi-Hsiang and Bingham, Harry and Eskilsson, Claes and Kramer, Morten and Babarit, Aurélien and Bunnik, Tim and Costello, Ronan and Crowley, Sarah and Gendron, Benjamin and Giorgi, Giuseppe and Giorgi, Simone and Girardin, Samuel and Greaves, Deborah and Heras, Pilar and Hoffman, Johan and Islam, Hafizul and Jakobsen, Ken-Robert and Janson, Carl-Erik and Jansson, Johan and Kim, Hyun Yul and Kim, Jeong-Seok and Kim, Kyong-Hwan and Kurniawan, Adi and Leoni, Massimiliano and Mathai, Thomas and Nam, Bo-Woo and Park, Sewan and Rajagopalan, Krishnakumar and Ransley, Edward and Read, Robert and Ringwood, John V. and Rodrigues, José Miguel and Rosenthal, Benjamin and Roy, André and Ruehl, Kelley and Schofield, Paul and Sheng, Wanan and Shiri, Abolfazl and Thomas, Sarah and Touzon, Imanol and Yasutaka, Imai
(2019)
Ocean Energy Systems Wave Energy Modelling Task: Modelling, Verification and Validation of Wave Energy Converters.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7 (11).
p. 379.
ISSN 2077-1312
Abstract
The International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems (OES) initiated the OES Wave Energy Conversion Modelling Task, which focused on the verification and validation of numerical models for simulating wave energy converters (WECs). The long-term goal is to assess the accuracy of and establish confidence in the use of numerical models used in design as well as power performance assessment of WECs. To establish this confidence, the authors used different existing computational modelling tools to simulate given tasks to identify uncertainties related to simulation methodologies: (i) linear potential flow methods; (ii) weakly nonlinear Froude–Krylov methods; and (iii) fully nonlinear methods (fully nonlinear potential flow and Navier–Stokes models). This article summarizes the code-to-code task and code-to-experiment task that have been performed so far in this project, with a focus on investigating the impact of different levels of nonlinearities in the numerical models. Two different WECs were studied and simulated. The first was a heaving semi-submerged sphere, where free-decay tests and both regular and irregular wave cases were investigated in a code-to-code comparison. The second case was a heaving float corresponding to a physical model tested in a wave tank. We considered radiation, diffraction, and regular wave cases and compared quantities, such as the WEC motion, power output and hydrodynamic loading.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
Cite as: Wendt F, Nielsen K, Yu Y-H, Bingham H, Eskilsson C, Kramer M, Babarit A, Bunnik T, Costello R, Crowley S, Gendron B, Giorgi G, Giorgi S, Girardin S, Greaves D, Heras P, Hoffman J, Islam H, Jakobsen K-R, Janson C-E, Jansson J, Kim HY, Kim J-S, Kim K-H, Kurniawan A, Leoni M, Mathai T, Nam B-W, Park S, Rajagopalan K, Ransley E, Read R, Ringwood JV, Rodrigues JM, Rosenthal B, Roy A, Ruehl K, Schofield P, Sheng W, Shiri A, Thomas S, Touzon I, Yasutaka I. Ocean Energy Systems Wave Energy Modelling Task: Modelling, Verification and Validation of Wave Energy Converters. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(11):379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7110379 |
Keywords: |
wave energy; numerical modelling; simulation; boundary element method; computational fluid dynamics; |
Academic Unit: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering > Electronic Engineering |
Item ID: |
15968 |
Identification Number: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7110379 |
Depositing User: |
Professor John Ringwood
|
Date Deposited: |
17 May 2022 12:42 |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
Publisher: |
mdpi |
Refereed: |
Yes |
URI: |
|
Use Licence: |
This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available
here |
Repository Staff Only(login required)
|
Item control page |
Downloads per month over past year
Origin of downloads