McDonnell, Cyril
(2018)
The Origins of the Husserl-Heidegger Philosophical Dispute in Twentieth-Century Phenomenology.
Maynooth Philosophical Papers, 9.
pp. 81-112.
ISSN 2009-7751
Abstract
This paper investigates the different ‘scientific’ methods of
enquiry that were proposed by Brentano, Dilthey, and Husserl in late
nineteenth-century philosophy as background to understanding the
philosophical dispute that later emerged between Husserl and Heidegger
regarding the definition of phenomenology in the twentieth century. It
argues that once Heidegger accepts both Dilthey’s approach and hermeneutic method of enquiry into human experiences, he is unable to follow
Husserl in his development of Brentano’s idea of a descriptive science of
consciousness and its objectivities into an eidetic science of pure intentional consciousness.
| Item Type: |
Article
|
| Keywords: |
Origins; Husserl-Heidegger; Philosophical Dispute; Twentieth Century Phenomenology; |
| Academic Unit: |
Faculty of Arts,Celtic Studies and Philosophy > Philosophy |
| Item ID: |
16096 |
| Identification Number: |
https://doi.org/10.5840/mpp201810305 |
| Depositing User: |
Dr Cyril McDonnell
|
| Date Deposited: |
14 Jun 2022 14:22 |
| Journal or Publication Title: |
Maynooth Philosophical Papers |
| Publisher: |
Maynooth University Department of Philosophy |
| Refereed: |
Yes |
| URI: |
|
| Use Licence: |
This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available
here |
Repository Staff Only(login required)
 |
Item control page |
Downloads per month over past year
Origin of downloads
Altmetric
Altmetric