MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Statutory Conventions: Conceptual Confusion or Sound Constitutional Development?


    Crummey, Conor and Ibarra, Eugenio Velasco (2018) Statutory Conventions: Conceptual Confusion or Sound Constitutional Development? Public Law. pp. 613-631. ISSN 0033-3565

    [img]
    Preview
    Download (269kB) | Preview


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    In Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, the Supreme Court held that the UK Parliament was under no legal obligation to seek the consent of the Scottish Parliament before passing legislation to leave the European Union. Section 28(8) of the Scotland Act 1998, they held, does not elevate the Sewel Convention from the status of political convention to legal requirement. We argue that the Court’s reasoning on this point was unclear and underdeveloped, and betrayed a conceptual confusion about the nature of political conventions. We focus on four problematic assumptions that the Court made: (i) That a political convention does not cease being a political convention even if it is recognised in statute; (ii) That (i) obtains because of the nature of the content of a political convention, regardless of formal legal enactment procedures; (iii) That Parliament did not intend that a legislative provision should create a justiciable legal rule; (iv) That the words ‘it is recognised’ and ‘will not normally’ in the relevant provision support (iii). In making these assumptions, the court in effect created a new constitutional category: the ‘statutory convention’. We argue that this was misguided, as section 28(8) created a legal duty on the UK Parliament to seek the consent of the Scottish Parliament before passing legislation to trigger Article 50. This legislation has passed, but as the constitutional landscape becomes ever more complex, the confusion over the nature of political conventions created by the Court merits examination and conceptual clarification.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: U.K. Public Law; Constitutional Conventions; Sewel Convention; Devolution; Scotland Act; Constitutional Theory;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
    Item ID: 18041
    Depositing User: Conor Crummey
    Date Deposited: 16 Jan 2024 14:54
    Journal or Publication Title: Public Law
    Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell
    Refereed: Yes
    URI:
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads