MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    A qualitative interview study to determine barriers and facilitators of implementing automated decision support tools for genomic data access


    Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki and Baek, Jinyoung and Lawson, Jonathan and Dove, Edward (2024) A qualitative interview study to determine barriers and facilitators of implementing automated decision support tools for genomic data access. BMC Medical Ethics, 25 (51). pp. 1-10. ISSN 1472-6939

    [img] Download (2MB)


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    Data access committees (DAC) gatekeep access to secured genomic and related health datasets yet are challenged to keep pace with the rising volume and complexity of data generation. Automated decision support (ADS) systems have been shown to support consistency, compliance, and coordination of data access review decisions. However, we lack understanding of how DAC members perceive the value add of ADS, if any, on the quality and effectiveness of their reviews. In this qualitative study, we report findings from 13 semi-structured interviews with DAC members from around the world to identify relevant barriers and facilitators to implementing ADS for genomic data access management. Participants generally supported pilot studies that test ADS performance, for example in cataloging data types, verifying user credentials and tagging datasets for use terms. Concerns related to over-automation, lack of human oversight, low prioritization, and misalignment with institutional missions tempered enthusiasm for ADS among the DAC members we engaged. Tensions for change in institutional settings within which DACs operated was a powerful motivator for why DAC members considered the implementation of ADS into their access workflows, as well as perceptions of the relative advantage of ADS over the status quo. Future research is needed to build the evidence base around the comparative effectiveness and decisional outcomes of institutions that do/not use ADS into their workflows.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: Data access committee; Implementation science; Automation; Decision support; Genomic data; Ethics;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
    Item ID: 18718
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01050-y
    Depositing User: IR Editor
    Date Deposited: 10 Jul 2024 16:15
    Journal or Publication Title: BMC Medical Ethics
    Publisher: BMC
    Refereed: Yes
    URI:
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads