Kelleher, Orla (2021) Systemic climate change litigation, standing rules and the Aarhus Convention: a purposive approach. Journal of Environmental Law. pp. 1-32. ISSN 0952-8873

Preview

Download (557kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article explores whether an exceptional approach to standing rules is needed to square the gatekeeping function of the courts of states/international organisations that are signatories to the Aarhus Convention with the complexity and urgency of the climate crisis. The central claim is that standing rules do not necessarily need to be reconstructed to resolve this conflict. Rather, what European states and the EU need to do is take their procedural human rights obligations under the Aarhus Convention seriously.

Item Type:	Article
Keywords:	Aarhus Convention; climate change litigation; standing; human rights;
Academic Unit:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
Item ID:	18862
Depositing User:	Orla Kelleher
Date Deposited:	11 Sep 2024 11:27
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Environmental Law
Publisher:	Oxford University Press
Refereed:	Yes
URI:	Publisher
Use Licence:	This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

Repository Staff Only(login required)

Item control page

Downloads

Origin of downloads