Pastine, Tuvana and Pastine, Ivan (2010) Political Campaign Spending Limits.
Download (235kB)
|
Abstract
Political campaign spending ceilings are purported to limit the incumbent’s ability to exploit his fundraising advantage. If the challenger does not have superior campaign effectiveness, in contrast to conventional wisdom, we show that the incumbent always benefits from a limit as long as he has an initial voter disposition advantage, however small and regardless of the candidates’ relative fundraising ability. If the challenger has higher campaign spending effectiveness, the effect of limits may be non-monotonic. If the incumbent enjoys a mild initial voter disposition advantage, a moderate limit benefits the challenger. Further restricting the limit favours the incumbent. Stricter limits may lead to the unintended consequence of increased expected spending.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Campaign Finance Legislation, Spending Cap, Expenditure Limit, Incumbency Advantage, Efficiency in Fundraising, Effectiveness of Campaign Spending, Initial Voter Disposition, All Pay Auction, Contest, Preferential Treatment Auction. |
Academic Unit: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Finance and Accounting |
Item ID: | 2104 |
Depositing User: | Ms Sandra Doherty |
Date Deposited: | 06 Sep 2010 08:51 |
Publisher: | NUI Maynooth |
URI: | |
Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only(login required)
Item control page |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year