MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson


    Tillman, Seth Barrett (2006) Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 4. pp. 207-218.

    [img] Download (67kB)


    Share your research

    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



    Add this article to your Mendeley library


    Abstract

    This article is published in conjunction with my MODEL CONTINUITY OF CONGRESS STATUTE. Professor Sanford V. Levinson in a comment, appearing with the MODEL, has voiced legal and prudential objections to my proposed statutory solution. This Reply responds to those objections.

    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: continuity; congress; textualist; Chadha;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
    Item ID: 2935
    Depositing User: Seth Tillman
    Date Deposited: 12 Jan 2012 10:01
    Journal or Publication Title: University of New Hampshire Law Review
    Publisher: University of New Hampshire School of Law
    Refereed: No
    URI:
      Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

      Repository Staff Only(login required)

      View Item Item control page

      Downloads

      Downloads per month over past year

      Origin of downloads

      Altmetric
      MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.