Tillman, Seth Barrett and Tillman, Nora (2010) A Fragment on Shall and May. American Journal of Legal History, 50. p. 453. ISSN 0002-9319
PDF
2010.50AJLH483.FRAGMENT.SHALLMAY.pdf
Download (492kB)
2010.50AJLH483.FRAGMENT.SHALLMAY.pdf
Download (492kB)
Abstract
This short paper has some comments on the Constitution's use of the verbs "shall" and "may" (and "will"). We suggest that the American English of the founding generation was a more capacious language than its modern successor and that which came into being post-Noah Webster's first dictionary and grade school primer, A Grammatical Institute of the English Language, first published in 1783. As we explain more fully, where a word once had multiple meanings, but only one variant is now remembered and understood, we may be seriously mistaken when we ascribe near certainty to our understanding of how a constitutional term was used
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | shall; may; will; Constitution; Anglo-English; American-English; Madison; |
Academic Unit: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Law |
Item ID: | 2896 |
Depositing User: | Seth Tillman |
Date Deposited: | 15 Dec 2011 12:15 |
Journal or Publication Title: | American Journal of Legal History |
Refereed: | Yes |
URI: | https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/2896 |
Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year