MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson


    Share and Export

    Tillman, Seth Barrett (2006) Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 4. pp. 207-218.

    [thumbnail of 2006.4PIERCE207.TILLMAN.pdf] PDF
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
    Download (67kB)

    Abstract

    This article is published in conjunction with my MODEL CONTINUITY OF CONGRESS STATUTE. Professor Sanford V. Levinson in a comment, appearing with the MODEL, has voiced legal and prudential objections to my proposed statutory solution. This Reply responds to those objections.
    Item Type: Article
    Keywords: continuity; congress; textualist; Chadha;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
    Item ID: 2935
    Depositing User: Seth Tillman
    Date Deposited: 12 Jan 2012 10:01
    Journal or Publication Title: University of New Hampshire Law Review
    Publisher: University of New Hampshire School of Law
    Refereed: No
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads

    Repository Staff Only (login required)

    Item control page
    Item control page
    MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library is powered by EPrints 3.4 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. About EPrints | Accessibility