MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library



    Networks of climate obstruction: Discourses of denial and delay in US fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical industries


    Kinol, Alaina, Si, Yutong, Kinol, John and Stephens, Jennie C. (2025) Networks of climate obstruction: Discourses of denial and delay in US fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical industries. PLOS Climate, 4 (1). e0000370. ISSN 2767-3200

    [thumbnail of journal.pclm.0000370.pdf]
    Preview
    Text
    journal.pclm.0000370.pdf

    Download (2MB) | Preview
    Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000370

    Abstract

    The use of fossil-derived hydrocarbons in fossil energy, plastic production, and agriculture makes these three sectors mutually reinforcing and reliant on sustained fossil fuel extraction. In this paper, we examine the ways the fossil fuel energy, plastics, and agrichemicals industries interact on social media using Twitter (renamed X as of 2023) data analysis, and we explore the implications of these interactions for policy. Content analysis of the text of tweets from the two largest US corporations and a major trade association for each sector (three discrete social media accounts for each sector) reveals coordinated messaging and identifies synergistic themes among these three sectors. Network analysis shows substantial engagement among the three sectors and identifies common external entities frequently mentioned in each sector. To understand the discursive strategies of the twitter networks of these three petrochemical derivative and fuel sectors, we propose the discourses of climate obstruction framework, adapted from and expanding on Lamb et al.’s (2020) discourses of climate delay framework. Our framework integrates both discourses of delay and discourses of denial because an integration of both were found in our analysis suggesting coordinated efforts to obstruct climate action. Our analysis suggests that discourses to deny and delay climate policy are aligned and coordinated across the three sectors to reinforce existing infrastructure and inhibit change. Exceptions in this alignment emerge for a few distinct sector-specific goals, including contrasting messages about biofuel. Despite some disparate views and different policy priorities among these three sectors, similar efforts to reinforce existing extractive petrochemical hegemony and undermine climate policy are clearly evident in each sector. These findings suggest that more research is needed to understand collaborative efforts among fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical producers to influence climate and energy policy.
    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: AK and JCS received a 2021 grant from CSSN: https://cssn.org/grants/grantees/. This grant funded AK and YS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
    Keywords: US fossil energy; plastic; agrichemical industries; climate policy;
    Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Geography
    Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Institutes > Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units, ICARUS
    Item ID: 19527
    Identification Number: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000370
    Depositing User: Jennie Stephens
    Date Deposited: 25 Feb 2025 16:54
    Journal or Publication Title: PLOS Climate
    Refereed: Yes
    Related URLs:
    URI: https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/19527
    Use Licence: This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here

    Repository Staff Only (login required)

    Item control page
    Item control page

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    Origin of downloads